Reactos 64 bit download9/20/2023 And not only that, it's always limited, the technology was simply not made for this, attempts to "emulate desktop" in browser are basically an abuse, it can never work well. I hate that I need to get the latest and fastest multi-core computer, in order to not have the web stuff terribly slow, especially when I know that proper native executable would run snappy even on 486. That's what operating system is for, optimized environment to run stuff. It's great that as programmer you can write it once and it works everywhere, but.Īs user, I don't want everything in browser. And web interfaces brought it to whole another level. Various cross-platform frameworks are slightly better, but still not great, there are always some compromises. There was Java and it worked, but the result always felt out of place, and requirements were higher. It's logical that there were always attempts to have solution that would allow to write the thing only once and still make it run everywhere. It's extra work, so it costs more, the code is different, there will be different bugs, etc. Having to write something several times for different OSes sucks. and eventually lose customers because of it. What a total waste of man hours to build both interfaces. VMware shot their foot with that stupid Flash interface that they forced on everyone, and then their HTML5 interface which (at the time - I don't know what they've done in 6.7) was not even on par with the Flash interface. Only for things like for example recent change in authentication. If you like Damn Small Linux, please consider donating even small contributions will help fund its continued development. Regular support for new RouterOS versions is now done using definition files shared by WinBox and WebFig, so nothing special for that would be required. Index - Applications - Packages - Download - Notes Off Site - Milestones - FAQ - Wiki - Forums - Blogs - Mini-ITX Store - Income Guide - Donate Browse The myDSL repository. It would be some extra initial work, but once done, further required changes would be small and infrequent. I'd argue that since WinBox is pretty stable and doesn't change much, it would now make sense to make native LinBox, MacBox or WhateverBox. But is there any, where someone had perfectly good native application, created new html-based one and all users were excited, because it was so much better? You can say that it's just one case and it doesn't prove anything. Previously I wasn't very excited about browser-based UIs, but since I've been forced by VMware to abandon their native client for ESXi and use the new html-based UI in browser, I've turned into enemy of such solutions. Native WinBox is exactly the right way to go. It's like trying to reform hammer, sure you can come up with something else that's not bad either, but it still won't be good replacement for the simple and reliable tool in all cases. Don't touch my WinBox, it's one of the best tools invented by mankind, and it's perfect as it is now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |